Can you clarify "giving ND way too much clout in the ACC"?
ACC gave ND
1. We gave them a football season and lifeline during the pandemic.
2. We gave them participation in Men's basketball and olympic sports.
ND gave the ACC
1. 5/12 of their FB schedule each year.
2. A commitment they can't join another conference but ACC til 2036
3. More leverage in negotiating their TV package / ACC network.
If we can agree on that, I really think you can say both sides added a lot of value to each other, thus it was mutually beneficial. It's not quite right to think of the ACC just giving, as the ACC took too.
|
(
In response to this post by VT ChemE 1986)
Posted: 08/26/2021 at 12:42PM